TP-Link Archer C7 AC1750 Wi-Fi router vs. Google Wifi: Which should you buy?
Nosotros may earn a commission for purchases using our links. Learn more.
Buyer's guideTP-Link Archer C7 AC1750 Wi-Fi router vs. Google Wifi: Which should you buy?
At Windows Central, nosotros exam and review plenty of PCs and accessories, including the hardware that can have your home network to the side by side level. If you tin can't decide between a bully router and a great mesh Wi-Fi kit, we can help by comparing TP-Link'southward Archer C7 and Google Wifi.Standard router
TP-Link Archer C7
Mesh networking
Google Wifi
The Archer C7 is a popular upkeep router for a reason. It can cover a standard home in reliable Wi-Fi, it'due south cheaper than a lot of similar options, and it's suitable for a wide multifariousness of tasks, including gaming and streaming.
$74 at Amazon
Pros
- More throughput (AC1750) than Google Wifi
- Two yr warranty, 24/7 support
- Price is lower
- Enough range for most average homes
- Easy setup and management
Cons
- Won't cover as much space as three-node Google Wifi
A single-node Google Wifi setup can't compete with the Archer C7 for throughput, cost, or range, but once you get into a full 3-node setup, you'll be able to cover far more space.
From $100 at Amazon
Pros
- Coverage up to iv,500 square feet
- One-year warranty, 24/vii support
- Supports wired backhaul
- Easy setup and management
- Small form gene
Cons
- Three-pack is considerably more expensive than the Archer C7
- Lower throughput (AC1200)
- No USB connectivity
We're comparing hither a standard router with a mesh network system, so there are some big differences that will no doubt make you lean one style or the other.
TP-Link Archer C7 vs. Google Wifi tech specs
| TP-Link Archer C7 | Google Wifi | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | AC1750 (450 Mbps + i,300 Mbps) | AC1200 (300 Mbps + 867 Mbps) |
| Frequency | 2.4 GHz, five GHz | 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz |
| Wireless standards | 802.11ac/n/a (5 GHz) 802.11b/g/northward (ii.4 GHz) | 802.11ac/northward/a (v GHz) 802.11b/g/north (2.4 GHz) |
| Processor | Single-cadre 720 MHz | Quad-cadre 710 MHz (each cadre) |
| Memory | xvi MB Flash 128 MB RAM | 4 GB eMMC storage 512 MB RAM |
| Ports | Two USB-A ii.0 | No USB |
| Ethernet | Four LAN One WAN | I LAN (per unit) Ane WAN (per unit) |
| Beamforming | No | Yes |
Performance
Although Google Wifi has a improve processor (CPU), more RAM, and more internal storage to better handle a loftier number of users, the TP-Link Archer C7 has better theoretical throughput at AC1750 compared to AC1200. This means that in that location's more room for traffic to flow, and in terms of raw functioning you should see better speeds with the C7.
Both the C7 and Google Wifi have 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz radios to handle gaming and streaming alongside less-important connections, and both have available Quality of Service (QoS) settings that allow you to prioritize certain devices over others.
One important matter to note is that without using an Ethernet connexion betwixt Google Wifi nodes, your bandwidth will exist cut in half in lodge to handle backhaul traffic beingness sent dorsum to the main node. Some mesh networking systems exercise offer a dedicated wireless radio for backhaul traffic, but not here. If you tin can't really imagine having an Ethernet cable running between nodes, know that yous will lose well-nigh half the advertised speed with devices connected to satellite nodes.
The Archer C7, compared to a single Google Wifi node, has better range (theoretically about 2,500 square feet compared to 1,500 square feet). However, once you add two other Google nodes for a total setup, that range extends to about 4,500 square anxiety. Overall, either device will provide a suitable network for near tasks, including video streaming or gaming, only for heavy traffic it's recommended to get with something with more throughput.
Features
Both of these devices have similar features — parental controls, invitee network, easy setup and management with an app — simply there are some standout differences. Those looking to add together external storage for local file sharing tin can do and so using either of the two USB-A 2.0 ports on the back of the C7. Each Google Wifi node does have a USB-C port, but it's used for a power supply when the network is up and running.
That USB-C port, with the correct corporeality of tinkering, can be used to root Google Wifi, allowing you to flash the device with something like GaleForce. It's easier to flash the C7'due south firmware with something like OpenWRT, but once washed, you'll be able to practise far more with either router, like set upwards a VPN for all devices in your home.
As for warranty and client service, TP-Link offers an excellent ii-year coverage bundle and 24/7 support in case anything goes incorrect. Google Wifi does too offer 24/7 support, merely its warranty maxes out at one year.
The Archer C7 is a bang-up budget router for virtually people
The Archer C7, when compared to a single Google Wifi node, offers better theoretical throughput and better range (up to 2,500 square feet compared to 1,500 square feet). If you don't need the added benefits of a 3-node Google Wifi mesh system, which costs virtually $257, you can save a lot of money by going with the C7.
Standard router
TP-Link Archer C7
A slap-up budget pick for most people.
The Archer C7 costs less than a single Google Wifi node, and will provide amend range and throughput. It also has two USB-A 2.0 ports for local file sharing, and it comes with corking warranty and support.
For better range, stick with Google Wifi
A mesh organization is designed to blanket a huge surface area in Wi-Fi, and that's exactly what a iii-node system from Google volition deliver. Its theoretical throughput is lower than that of the Archer C7, merely if you accept a multi-level or spread out home or function, this organisation should exist well worth the extra money.
Mesh networking
Google Wifi
A fine solution for large home or office.
A single node might not cover equally much area as the C7, but a two- or 3-node Google Wifi setup volition allow y'all to accomplish your network into the far corners of a large home or role. It is quite a bit more expensive, though, then only invest if y'all truly need that actress coverage.
We may earn a commission for purchases using our links. Learn more.
Buyer'due south guide
These are the all-time Netgear routers available now
Love Netgear and want to improve your home internet? We've rounded upwards the best routers available now, whether yous're looking to game, prepare a mesh network, or just savor lag-complimentary net in your home.
Cale Hunt
Cale Hunt is a staff author at Windows Central. He focuses mainly on PC, laptop, and accompaniment coverage, likewise equally the emerging earth of VR. He is an avid PC gamer and multi-platform user, and spends almost of his time either tinkering with or writing about tech.
Source: https://www.windowscentral.com/tp-link-archer-c7-ac1750-wi-fi-router-vs-google-wifi-which-should-you-buy
Posted by: bradleypand1956.blogspot.com
0 Response to "TP-Link Archer C7 AC1750 Wi-Fi router vs. Google Wifi: Which should you buy?"
Post a Comment